Authors: Anees Bahji; Marlon Danilewitz; Tony P. George; Arash Dhaliwal; David N. Crockford · Research
Is Prescribing Psychostimulants an Effective Treatment for Stimulant Use Disorder?
A critical examination of the evidence supporting psychostimulant prescriptions for treating stimulant use disorders.
Source: Bahji, A., Danilewitz, M., George, T. P., Dhaliwal, A., & Crockford, D. N. (2023). Evidence base to support using prescribed psychostimulants to treat psychostimulant use disorder is limited. CMAJ, 195(39), E1354. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.149222-l
What you need to know
- The effectiveness of prescribed psychostimulants for treating stimulant use disorders is uncertain and not well-established.
- Prescribed stimulants carry substantial risks, particularly for people using methamphetamines, where the risk of psychosis is high.
- More rigorous clinical trials are needed to assess the benefits and risks of using prescribed psychostimulants for stimulant use disorders.
Understanding stimulant use disorder and its treatment challenges
Stimulant use disorder is a serious condition that affects many individuals worldwide. It involves the problematic use of stimulant drugs like cocaine, methamphetamine, or prescription stimulants, leading to significant impairment or distress. As the global community grapples with the ongoing drug overdose crisis, researchers and clinicians are exploring various treatment options to help those struggling with stimulant addiction.
One proposed approach is the use of prescribed psychostimulants as a treatment for stimulant use disorder. This method is similar to substitution therapies used for opioid use disorders, where controlled doses of opioid medications are prescribed to help manage cravings and withdrawal symptoms. However, the effectiveness and safety of this approach for stimulant use disorders are subjects of ongoing debate in the medical community.
The limited evidence for prescribed psychostimulants
While the idea of using prescribed psychostimulants to treat stimulant use disorder may seem logical, the current evidence supporting this approach is limited. Several reviews and meta-analyses have examined the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for stimulant use disorders, including the use of prescribed stimulants. These studies have generally concluded that there is a lack of strong evidence to support the benefits of this treatment approach.
For example, a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Tardelli and colleagues looked at the use of prescription psychostimulants for treating stimulant use disorder. Their findings suggested that the evidence supporting this intervention is not well-established. This means that while some studies may show potential benefits, the overall body of research does not provide strong, consistent support for the effectiveness of this treatment approach.
Another systematic review by Ronsley and colleagues reached similar conclusions. They found that the evidence supporting pharmacological interventions, including prescribed stimulants, for the treatment of stimulant use disorders was lacking. This further underscores the need for more robust research in this area.
Potential risks and concerns
While exploring new treatment options is crucial, it’s equally important to consider the potential risks associated with prescribed psychostimulants. One significant concern is the risk of psychosis, particularly for individuals who use methamphetamines. Psychosis is a severe mental state where a person loses touch with reality, experiencing hallucinations or delusions. The risk of triggering or exacerbating psychosis in people with a history of methamphetamine use is a serious consideration that cannot be overlooked.
Another important aspect to consider is the potential for these prescribed stimulants to reduce cravings for illicit stimulants. Currently, the evidence supporting this potential benefit remains inconclusive. This means that while some individuals might experience reduced cravings, others may not, and the overall effectiveness of this approach in managing cravings is not yet clear.
The need for comprehensive treatment approaches
While the use of prescribed psychostimulants might have a role in treating some individuals with stimulant use disorders, it’s crucial to emphasize the importance of a comprehensive treatment approach. This means that any pharmacological intervention should be part of a broader treatment plan that includes various supportive services.
Some key components of a comprehensive treatment approach include:
Housing support: Stable housing is fundamental to recovery and can significantly impact treatment outcomes.
Medical care: Regular medical check-ups and treatment for any co-occurring health issues are essential.
Psychiatric support: Mental health care is crucial, especially given the high rates of co-occurring mental health disorders among individuals with substance use disorders.
Evidence-based behavioral interventions: Strategies like contingency management, which provides tangible rewards for maintaining abstinence, have shown promise in treating stimulant use disorders.
These comprehensive services should accompany any pharmacological treatment to provide the best chance for successful recovery.
The importance of rigorous clinical trials
Given the limited evidence and potential risks associated with prescribed psychostimulants for stimulant use disorders, conducting rigorous clinical trials is essential before considering widespread implementation of this treatment approach. These trials should assess various factors, including:
- Adherence to the prescribed medication regimen
- Changes in substance use patterns
- Treatment retention rates
- Effects on cravings
- Impact on overdose rates
By carefully evaluating these factors, researchers can gain valuable insights into the benefits and risks of using prescribed psychostimulants for stimulant use disorders. This information is crucial for guiding treatment decisions and ensuring patient safety.
The potential role of prescribed stimulants in specific cases
While the broader integration of prescribed psychostimulants is not currently supported by strong evidence, there may be a role for this approach in select cases. For instance, some individuals with both opioid and stimulant use disorders (without a history of psychosis) might benefit from prescribed stimulants as part of their treatment plan. However, it’s important to note that this approach should be considered on a case-by-case basis and not as a standard treatment for all individuals with stimulant use disorders.
The importance of continued research and careful implementation
As the medical community continues to explore potential treatments for stimulant use disorders, it’s crucial to maintain a balanced approach. While the idea of using prescribed psychostimulants is promising and warrants further investigation, careful consideration is vital to avoid unintended harm.
Continued research, particularly in the form of well-designed clinical trials, is essential. These studies will provide valuable insights into the benefits and risks of using prescribed psychostimulants for stimulant use disorders. This information will be crucial in guiding treatment decisions and ensuring patient safety in the management of these complex disorders.
Conclusions
- The evidence supporting the use of prescribed psychostimulants for treating stimulant use disorders is currently limited and inconclusive.
- Potential risks, particularly the risk of psychosis in methamphetamine users, need careful consideration.
- A comprehensive treatment approach, including housing support, medical care, psychiatric support, and evidence-based behavioral interventions, is crucial for managing stimulant use disorders.
- More rigorous clinical trials are needed to assess the effectiveness and safety of prescribed psychostimulants before considering widespread implementation.